Unqualified Oppose and maintain status quo.Tevildo ( talk) - Preceding undated comment added 17:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Reply If the Latin title is unacceptable, I would suggest On The Celestial Hierarchy as an accurate and unambiguous English title. (And strongly disagree that the disambiguation page has 'no useful material' - disambig pages don't have material by nature, but I suspect the links there are to more relevant articles than this one.) SnowFire ( talk) 21:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Reply No objection if the article is moved to ' The Celestial Hierarchy', or even something like Celestial Hierarchy (Pseudo-Dionysius), but it's not the primary topic of 'celestial hierarchy'. People who talk about the 'celestial hierarchy' don't mean one extremely obscure apocryphal book, they really mean 'angelology'. Oppose (note: was the person who changed the Celestial Hierarchy redirect to point to the disambig page).

(See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English).) St Anselm ( talk) 16:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Reply

Move to The Celestial Hierarchy as the most common English name: e.g.

– robertsky ( talk) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Reply – robertsky ( talk) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Reply Note: WikiProject Philosophy has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky ( talk) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Reply Note: WikiProject Christianity has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky ( talk) 18:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Reply Note: WikiProject Occult has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky ( talk) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC) - Relisting. - Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 18:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC) - Relisting. AndrewNJ ( talk) 11:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC) - Relisting.

There is a redirect page at this title at the moment but it has minimal useful material. Favonian ( talk) 20:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Reply ĭe Coelesti Hierarchia → Celestial Hierarchy – As suggested previously, this is a page for an influential work written in Ancient Greek, most commonly referred to by its English name in Anglophone writing. The result of the move request was: no consensus. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page.

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move.

De coelesti hierarchia pdf